I believe in open discussion and I would be against anything that goes against that
So you don't disagree with GG who sacked guiders for wanting to discuss the implications? Who have closed down the discussion. Sadly even if you disagree you can't change the reality.
You have repeatedly asserted that it will all be lovely. You don't answer any of the questions being asked other than repeating "it'll all be fine".
You seem to be in total denial of the reality of Guiding facilities. As with the Guider up thread there are no facilities with reach of my area (a city) which would enable this shangri la solution to take place. Even if there was, many girls would simply be removed for religious reasons or due to experience of sexual abuse.
And you are ignoring the fact that Guiders are not allowed to tell parents what is happening.
So how does that conversation go with the girl from a strict religious background?
Parent: do you have trans girls as my daughter cannot share space with a male bodied person
Guider: I'm not allowed to tell you
Parent: But we really want her to continue, it just won't be possible if there could be male bodied people
Guider: I'm not allowed to tell you but policy is to accept male bodied people
Parent: then we have to withdraw
Its going to be a similar discussion with young victims of abuse.
Its all very well repeating endlessly about us all sitting around with a cup of tea and a nice chat and coming out as besties. In the real world there is a direct conflict of rights which needs to be addressed and Guiders are not allowed to address or discuss them.
So how do you answer just the shared accommodation issue without using the words "it should be different from the current reality"?
What do you do when parents sue over sexual contact when you were in loco parentis?
With adults I would love expect a transition or intention to transition
There you go again. You are "expecting" but you are wrong. Most trans women these days do not transition (as in they keep the genitalia). You can expect all you like but the facts are against you.
I