You immediately leapt to the defence of Naples and then accusingly asked posters why they don't make the same points about US cities, sheer whataboutery, we were NOT talking about the USA we were comparing the UK and Italy.
Naples was described as a shithole but not just because of the armed guards outside Lidl.
If you really cannot see why your opening post list would cause offence, and did, I can't help you as I tried to point it out clearly to you in my post of 15.23.
You have repeatedly refused to say why that opening list wasn't more balanced - to start with it was 9-5 against the UK, I am discounting point 5 of your 'in favour' list because you even used that supposedly favourable point to slate the UK over immigration. Secondly, your 'in favour' list was pretty risible set against you 'not in favour' list.
You very reluctantly accepted the points made about corruption in Italy and then, as per usual, came up with a caveat, without proof, relating to the Channel Islands and the Cayman Islands.
You went nuclear when I mentioned the influence the Catholic Church wields in Italy, again that didn't fit your carefully crafted agenda.
I am nowhere near as sensitive or blinkered about the UK as you appear to be about Italy. I am well aware the UK has faults which it deserves criticism, and at times robust criticism, over.