Ansumpasty no not everyone who uses this tech is creepy etc but THIS guy his -
Shown by his reaction to the dd withdrawing her consent to being tracked.
His wife's reluctance to challenge him.
His attitude to both his wife and dd especially in terms of him thinking his financial provision for either entitles him to breach their right to privacy!
Op has even said one of the reasons he's given us he wants to know WHO she's with - she's an adult that's none of his damn business!
All of that strongly sounds like he's wanting to control her friendships, her sexuality- DEEPLY creepy from a FATHER - hell even if it was a husband it'd be creepy!
So THIS guy IS controlling, creepy AND abusive!
There are more creepy fathers around than some like to admit to themselves. I've got one, I think at least one pp has said they have, when I disclosed this to people I've discovered several people in my own circle have fathers who even if they haven't directly abused their child have behaved in deeply inappropriate ways regarding policing their sexuality and relationships.
I've lived overseas - the last time as an army wife, had dd just before leaving, living off base. Not only pre mobile phones but before my family or us had regular access to Internet initially either. Landline calls (bloody expensive!) and post only. millions have done this. I've several relatives who are emigrants to USA, Canada, aus, NZ, South Africa... They went at a time where most households didn't even have a phone! People managed just fine without knowing where their kids were every 15 bloody mins!
Geez my dd is 17, I haven't NEEDED to know where she is every 15 mins since she was probably about 10! If I tried to police where she goes now, track her like this she'd rightly find it invasive and infuriating! She's a good kid, no angel, but I've raised her to behave reasonably well, how to conduct herself correctly AND how to stay relatively safe (unfortunately you can't anticipate or protect against everything but you can't wrap them in cotton wool either. They need to live a life!)
That's just made me realise the irony here - he's probably claiming he's doing this due to concern for her safety when based not only on op's comments but statistically too - HE is a bigger threat to her than the outside world!
Op you may find it interesting to google such terms as emotional incest, enmeshment,
That post at 0846 was COMPLETELY uncalled for!
YOU should maybe Google enmeshment too.
How often someone speaks to their loved ones is NOT necessarily an indication of how close they are, although I'd argue it COULD indicate they're too close if there's excessive communication.
There's a family I know who would describe themselves as 'close' - I would describe them as unhealthily enmeshed. They not only call/text each other several times a day, they see each other most days, the now grown children all live less than 2 miles from the parents/grandparents, they never socialise completely outside the family group and even holiday regularly (2/3 times a year) together. The spouses of the children regularly feel ignored, ostracised, their views on how THEIR children are raised are often dismissed. There's already been 2 divorces as a result of the family dynamics and the ex-spouses had to fight tooth and nail for reasonable access to their own DC. It's highly dysfunctional and obvious to those outside it.