I've namechanged because I have a few family members on here.
I'm in the process of buying a house. On Saturday I spotted a lovely house online which I am viewing tomorrow. I told my mum about it and sent her the link.
Her first reaction was "It's only two bedroom, where are me and your dad going to sleep when we come?".
I told her it wasn't a done deal but if we did get the house, they'd have to stay in a hotel or rental.
She wasn't happy at all about this and told me I had to have a spare room for guests and I was being selfish for even considering a house without one.
My parent only visit once a year. DP's parents visit twice or three times a year, which means our current spare room gets used for about ten nights every year. We live in a very touristy city and we're about a mile from the city centre so there are hotels and guest houses very close to us.
I don't think I'm being unreasonable here but when I told my sister about it she sort of sided with my mum. She didn't say my mum was right but she said it was "off" to buy a house that has no room for guests.
In this area, three bedroom houses are about £40,000 more expensive than two bedroom ones. We could afford this but obviously it means longer on the mortgage and also means having a room which isn't used but needs cleaning
Plus, the two bedroom house we've seen is perfect for us.
So, am I missing something here? Am I being massively unreasonable?