Have a chat with them about delay even though it's unlikely to stop them I don't think sex at 14 is going to be that great especially for her so if they can wait a while. Even a very mature 14 year old is still technically a child and may regret losing her virginity so young.
-----
Agree with the above. They'll have much more fun just making out and messing around - what's wrong with that? The actual act of intercourse is likely to be something of a damp squib at that age . Why not wait til they are a bit older and see if the relationship progresses?
At such a tender age it would be a shame to be worrying about unwanted pregnancy and STDs.
Surely better to take things slowly, enjoy long make-out sessions and look forward to being a bit older when they can move onto the more heavy stuff?
I get that they are both curious and they probably want to feel 'grown up' and all that but I think 14 is too young for a full sexual relationship. The definition of sex, in any case, is very broad and includes a great deal of activity which is short of intercourse so I would have thought there was plenty to keep them going when lust is high.
That said, if they are going to do it anyway then it is really important that they are both responsible about birth control so that is a conversation that needs to be had.
I remember when two of my children were about 12 and 14 the older sister of one of their friends had just had a baby at 16. The boyfriend did a runner. There was much discussion among my two about how the girl's' parents 'should' step in and bring up the baby. The parents (perhaps to teach her a lesson) were threatening to put the baby up for adoption. I think in the end they did step in - probably just wanted to make a stand first - but the point was it was far too late for that kind of discussion. And boyfriend disappeared into the hills although I suppose that child support does apply to under-age parents too?
I also made it quite clear to my children that they couldn't necessarily expect me or their father to step in and bring up any children that they had, should they accidentally get pregnant. They had to take some responsibility themselves. This is presumably why the law states 16 for consent.
Therein lies the problem with children under 16 having sexual intercourse. They are not yet adults so their parents are still responsible for them. I think that if you are the parent of children under 16 who are engaging in sexual intercourse you have to be able to have a discussion along these lines with your children. At such a young age, how can they possibly be able to take responsibility for the consequences?
I'm glad it was a conversation I had with mine - it gave them something to think about when I made it clear that it was not necessarily reasonable to expect the parents to step in and bring up the child. I think there had also been discussions about termination but that had not been acceptable for the girl. Again, it was too late for that discussion as well.
I think it's a shame that at such a young age teenagers are having to grapple with what should really be adult dilemmas. Why not just enjoy teenage crushes with making out and having fun?