They blame men (as a class) and don't understand how this is offensive.
I think that's been covered several times over in this thread. Talking about how men as a class need to take responsibility for misogyny (btw for THEIR benefit as well as ours - look at male suicide rates!) is NOT THE SAME THING as saying "I hate men, all men are evil". Jesus.
They are hypocritical in their oversimplification of issues. NAMALT is apparently unacceptable whereas the opposite is true if radical feminists are used as examples of issues.
What is a radical feminist and what examples here are you talking about because I can't think of any?
They misuse statistics to suit their agenda.
Which statistics?
They talk about men and the patriarchy and how 'the menz' need to sort out any problem which does affect them but use the term MRA if anyone tries and help men.
I've spoken several times about male suicide rates on this thread, as one example. As another, you do realise that a lot of the problems which men face in society are because of the fucking patriarchy and misogyny?
They ignore the significant advantages women now have in society simply continuing to say that society is stacked against them despite evidence to the contrary.
What evidence to the contrary? What advantages do I have, as a woman, which my DH and my son don't have?
They shout-down people like the OP for daring to have a different opinion or question.
OP has not been "shouted down". OP has been challenged, and thus far has not provided any coherent response. "Shouting down" would be SHUT UP OP YOU'RE NOT ALLOWED TO POST.
Thoughts?