Bettercallsaul1
Why would you decide that the people who cheered for Meghan and Harry are somehow less representative of the British public than those turning out for the Queen and other members of the royal family?
There you go again. I didn't write that, did I? You just made that up. I didn't write that so I cannot say why I decided something you have just made up in your head. You are talking around your own fiction. Read again precisely what I wrote. I said that a self-selecting group waving at MM and H are not representative of the majority of the British people. It is pure statistical fact. How you cannot get your head around that is utterly beyond me. 
What I said was that you do not represent the majority of the people in this country - and again, I repeat, thank God.
No, you lie. You actually wrote: Luckily the enthusiastic reaction of the crowds on her and Harry's first public walk-about demonstrated that the majority of people in this country don't agree. That, as I wrote before, is statistically ludicrous. The reaction of the crowds who came out does not demonstrate that the majority of people in this country don't agree with your previous line which was to denigrate Megan Markle and non-White people generally. To say a group of hand wavers represents the majority of people in this country is madness.
The premise of the thread was that, in the conversation overheard by the OP, the speaker said that Harry and Megan Markle did not look "right" together because she was not "An English Rose". Whether you define this phrase as meaning blonde hair/blue eyes or dark hair/green eyes etc, what the speaker obviously meant was Caucasian.
The speaker meant English Rose. English Rose happens to mean Caucasian. The speaker didn't obviously mean Caucasian, they obviously meant English Rose. If they meant Caucasian, they would have said white. They didn't. They meant English Rose. I know you absolutely desperately want to see racism everywhere you look, but it's not here. She meant a specific look familiar with English Culture.
She was saying that a couple of different races didn't "look right" together.
No, you have just made that up in your head again. She was saying that she felt Prince Harry should be with an English Rose. Any translation of the type of look that this woman felt Prince Harry in particular should be with into *a couple of different races didn't look right together" is a massive leap of logic and subject matter, and is all 100% made up in your own mind. Why are making things up like this?
This remark was judgemental and racist and very reminiscent of attitudes underlying the Apartheid system in South Africa or America in the time of the Jim Crowe laws, which forebad interracial marriage
Oh my god, that just made me laugh out loud. Can you hear yourself?
There is no evidence whatsoever that Meghan Markle worked as a stripper.
Why did MM put it as work experience on her own CV then?
What she is known for - along with being a successful actress - is being very active in charity work, espousing little-known causes such as the provision of sanitary wear for girls in India.
Most people I know had never heard of her until the Daily Mail started doing stories about her with Prince Harry. Never seen her on TV, know nothing about her charity work. So no, she is not generally known for any of this.
She came over as an intelligent, charming and committed person on her TV interview with Prince Harry and I'm quite sure that most of the country warmed to her as much as I did.
You believe that. I believe she came over as untruthful and tacky, and was inappropriate in her pouty and strutting poses that lacked decorum. We differ. Unlike you, I'd never be so arrogant or ignorant to claim anything about most of the country agreeing with me, no matter how desperate I was to believe it.