My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

AIBU?

To think it's unfair on HRH Catherine

764 replies

InLoveWithLizML · 28/11/2017 08:24

It's been on my mind that a spring wedding is one way to make sure all eyes are on you and not Catherine. As depending on the date chosen she'll either be extremely heavily pregnant or possibly postpartum, she's never really rushed to the celeb demands of having your pre-pregnancy body in 4 weeks. If she has HG that lasts till term she really won't enjoy the day, I remember one heavily pregnant Mum when I got married going home in the end to rest she was struggling that much.

It'll be a dilemma for William as he'll want to celebrate the day, as will Catherine. If she's heavily pregnant or post partum he got really overly drink, I think I'm right in thinking Catherine BF so she can't drink and needs somewhere private to feed. (Plus possibly an outfit that allows for ease of feeding)

I'm wondering if there's already an announcement due for once their married, that Harry & Meghan are expecting, thus the 4/5 month turn around if not quicker, going by my interpretations of Spring. It seems rather rushed.

I understand given Meghan's age it's now or never, I just feel it's a bit harsh on Catherine, as in any scenario she'll not overly get to celebrate the day. She's always been close to Harry, so I assume she'd want to take part and have a time similar to her wedding, partying till the small hours.

A summer wedding would give Catherine & William the luxury of not worrying if baby will arrive imminently, or that Catherine will be postpartum, knackered and really not feel like a part of the day.

I know it's Harry & Meghan's big day, but as I've said he's always been close to his brother and SIL. I honestly thought any announcement would be with the third pregnancy in mind.

OP posts:
Report
lightlite · 02/12/2017 20:23

Oh ok, everything the palace tells us is the truth. Righto Hmm

Report
SoupDragon · 02/12/2017 20:26

Oh ok, everything the palace tells us is the truth

So you think the hopital stay was fabricated? The one that meant they had to announce her first pregnancy earlier than normal?

Report
SoupDragon · 02/12/2017 20:28

What do you think they had to gain from doing that?

Report
Nikephorus · 02/12/2017 20:33

However she hasn't put a foot wrong since marrying William and they seem devoted to each other.
Well, except for the topless / nearly naked photos when she should have been at the paralympics, and the assorted showing her underwear (and more) because she doesn't dress decently for the weather conditions, not to mention the lack of public engagements (regardless of pregnancies).....

Report
gingergenius · 02/12/2017 20:42

Well, except for the topless / nearly naked photos when she should have been at the paralympics, and the assorted showing her underwear (and more) because she doesn't dress decently for the weather conditions, not to mention the lack of public engagements (regardless of pregnancies).....

I really hope this was said ironically???? Confused

Report
JonSnowsWife · 03/12/2017 09:32

Well, except for the topless / nearly naked photos when she should have been at the paralympics, and the assorted showing her underwear (and more) because she doesn't dress decently for the weather conditions, not to mention the lack of public engagements (regardless of pregnancies).....

Dress appropriately for the weather? 😂 gosh how atrociously behaved was she? .

Report
lightlite · 03/12/2017 10:54

so you think the hopital stay was fabricated?
How on earth could that be possible Confused

Report
SoupDragon · 03/12/2017 11:36

You tell me. You're the who thinks they've fabricated her difficult pregnancies.

Report
dingdongdigeridoo · 03/12/2017 11:58

Kate was in dereliction of her duties when she took her bikini top off on private land. As a royal, she should never be naked, and should wear giant pantaloons in case some creepy fuck decides to take photos of her getting out of a car.

Report
StealthPolarBear · 03/12/2017 12:02

Very relieved to see you were being sarcastic :o

Report
Nikephorus · 03/12/2017 15:46

I was referring to the fact that she wears dresses that blow up to show her knickers despite knowing it's windy. Most intelligent women would realise that behaviour like that makes them look like they're attention-seeking tarts.

Report
JonSnowsWife · 03/12/2017 15:55

Most intelligent women would realise that behaviour like that makes them look like they're attention-seeking tarts.

Confused

Report
DorisDangleberry · 03/12/2017 16:02

So Princess Kate is an attention seeking tart Grin

Maybe she is like that because Wills is in an airtight closet

Report
Jeanneweany · 03/12/2017 17:02

Do we think m sparkle is already knocked and it will be her due date?

Report
Jeanneweany · 03/12/2017 17:03

Knocked up

Report
Rainbowandraindrops67 · 03/12/2017 17:04

Well given that Harry told us all they had shared a tent on their third date it’s a definite possibility!!

Report
Rainbowandraindrops67 · 03/12/2017 17:06

I wonder why she didn’t have kids with her last husband though - i wouldn’t be surprised if harry and Meghan don’t have any kids actually - she is 36 and assuming they wait to be married to start trying she’s going to be at least 37 with her first even if it happens straight away. Somehow I don’t think they’ll have to wait long for ivf etc though!

Report
Increasinglymiddleaged · 03/12/2017 19:50

I wonder why she didn’t have kids with her last husband though

Well they were only married 2 years. At the risk of stating the bleeding obvious not everyone has them straight away....!

Report
DorisDangleberry · 03/12/2017 19:55

I wonder at what point she will discover he is gay and the manly army thing is all a front

Report
VanillaSugar · 03/12/2017 19:58

Who? Kate or Megs?

Report
BertrandRussell · 03/12/2017 19:59

"I wonder why she didn’t have kids with her last husband though"

At a wild guess- because she didn't want to?

Report
Rainbowandraindrops67 · 03/12/2017 20:15

Increasingly - she was with him for 6/7 years in total

Report

Don’t want to miss threads like this?

Weekly

Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!

Log in to update your newsletter preferences.

You've subscribed!

Rainbowandraindrops67 · 03/12/2017 20:15

Yes Doris! A marriage of convenience for them both!

Report
Lweji · 03/12/2017 20:18

From the time I met my ex to when I got pregnant with DS it was about 8 years. It means nothing. I could easily have got divorced before DS was conceived.

Report
Increasinglymiddleaged · 03/12/2017 20:28

Increasingly - she was with him for 6/7 years in total
Confused and I had been with DH for 10 years before we started a family.

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.