My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

AIBU?

To think it's unfair on HRH Catherine

764 replies

InLoveWithLizML · 28/11/2017 08:24

It's been on my mind that a spring wedding is one way to make sure all eyes are on you and not Catherine. As depending on the date chosen she'll either be extremely heavily pregnant or possibly postpartum, she's never really rushed to the celeb demands of having your pre-pregnancy body in 4 weeks. If she has HG that lasts till term she really won't enjoy the day, I remember one heavily pregnant Mum when I got married going home in the end to rest she was struggling that much.

It'll be a dilemma for William as he'll want to celebrate the day, as will Catherine. If she's heavily pregnant or post partum he got really overly drink, I think I'm right in thinking Catherine BF so she can't drink and needs somewhere private to feed. (Plus possibly an outfit that allows for ease of feeding)

I'm wondering if there's already an announcement due for once their married, that Harry & Meghan are expecting, thus the 4/5 month turn around if not quicker, going by my interpretations of Spring. It seems rather rushed.

I understand given Meghan's age it's now or never, I just feel it's a bit harsh on Catherine, as in any scenario she'll not overly get to celebrate the day. She's always been close to Harry, so I assume she'd want to take part and have a time similar to her wedding, partying till the small hours.

A summer wedding would give Catherine & William the luxury of not worrying if baby will arrive imminently, or that Catherine will be postpartum, knackered and really not feel like a part of the day.

I know it's Harry & Meghan's big day, but as I've said he's always been close to his brother and SIL. I honestly thought any announcement would be with the third pregnancy in mind.

OP posts:
Report
Lweji · 15/12/2017 13:30

OP, are you disappointed? Or do you think Kate will have enough time?

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle to marry on 19 May

www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/dec/15/prince-harry-and-meghan-markle-to-marry-on-19-may

Report
gingergenius · 04/12/2017 04:40

@Nikephorus some lovely misogynistic language there!

Report
bananasaregood · 04/12/2017 04:26

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

BitOutOfPractice · 04/12/2017 04:19

* Most intelligent women would realise that behaviour like that makes them look like they're attention-seeking tarts.*

I think attention is one thing that Kate does not lack

Report
Littlehenrylee · 03/12/2017 23:57

Battleax what on earth are you talking about? I’m getting the impression you’d argue with yourself.

Report
Raisedbyguineapigs · 03/12/2017 23:44

She was only young and an aspiring actress when she married the first time. Its hardly surprising if she felt she would rather wait to have children. Actresses have a far more limited time to establish a career than actors. She also probably isn't the first person who thought that after such a long time together it was marriage or split, and who made the wrong choice.

Report
VanillaSugar · 03/12/2017 23:20

I thought it was Mavis?

Report
Battleax · 03/12/2017 22:54

No need for you to be so odd then Wink

Report
Littlehenrylee · 03/12/2017 22:46

That goes without saying surely?

Report
Battleax · 03/12/2017 22:31

If divorce was on the cards, she would hardly start trying for a baby or am I missing something??!

So divorce was "On the cards" at the point they married after seven years together? Confused

You're being very obtuse in your efforts to ridicule the question.

Why not just point out that there could be a million reasons a couple don't have children?

Report
Littlehenrylee · 03/12/2017 22:16

If divorce was on the cards, she would hardly start trying for a baby or am I missing something??!

She also had a very successful career so why would she want kids? Royal babies are a different matter.

Report
Rainbowandraindrops67 · 03/12/2017 22:08

I think she was 34 when they divorced

Report
Littlehenrylee · 03/12/2017 22:03

Wasn’t she very young when she met her ex? Not many people make a decision to have children at 23! Scrap that, I don’t know many people who decide to have children under thirty!


Harry is gay? This is the first time I’ve read that. I remember reading the same thing here about Brad Putt and George Clooney. Nonsense.

Report
sunshinestorm · 03/12/2017 20:29

You can't plan your life around other people's pregnancies!

Report
Increasinglymiddleaged · 03/12/2017 20:28

Increasingly - she was with him for 6/7 years in total
Confused and I had been with DH for 10 years before we started a family.

Report
Lweji · 03/12/2017 20:18

From the time I met my ex to when I got pregnant with DS it was about 8 years. It means nothing. I could easily have got divorced before DS was conceived.

Report
Rainbowandraindrops67 · 03/12/2017 20:15

Yes Doris! A marriage of convenience for them both!

Report
Rainbowandraindrops67 · 03/12/2017 20:15

Increasingly - she was with him for 6/7 years in total

Report
BertrandRussell · 03/12/2017 19:59

"I wonder why she didn’t have kids with her last husband though"

At a wild guess- because she didn't want to?

Report
VanillaSugar · 03/12/2017 19:58

Who? Kate or Megs?

Report
DorisDangleberry · 03/12/2017 19:55

I wonder at what point she will discover he is gay and the manly army thing is all a front

Report
Increasinglymiddleaged · 03/12/2017 19:50

I wonder why she didn’t have kids with her last husband though

Well they were only married 2 years. At the risk of stating the bleeding obvious not everyone has them straight away....!

Report

Don’t want to miss threads like this?

Weekly

Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!

Log in to update your newsletter preferences.

You've subscribed!

Rainbowandraindrops67 · 03/12/2017 17:06

I wonder why she didn’t have kids with her last husband though - i wouldn’t be surprised if harry and Meghan don’t have any kids actually - she is 36 and assuming they wait to be married to start trying she’s going to be at least 37 with her first even if it happens straight away. Somehow I don’t think they’ll have to wait long for ivf etc though!

Report
Rainbowandraindrops67 · 03/12/2017 17:04

Well given that Harry told us all they had shared a tent on their third date it’s a definite possibility!!

Report
Jeanneweany · 03/12/2017 17:03

Knocked up

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.