shirtyQuerty
It's pretty clear that taxonomy is not your strong suit. Nice to see that it hasn't hindered your confidence in expressing your opinion though.
"Even carnivores can be vegetarian"
Did the lack of logic when writing this hurt?
Only if you don't understand the difference between a taxonomic group and dietary selection. Fortunately I do, so no, it didn't. Thanks for asking though 
Bloody pandas. Taking over the world with their rabid reproduction. Thriving, aren't they!
Please do bowl me over with your in-depth and evidence-based argument for how vegetarianism influences reproductive rates. I'm all ears
We're much more closely related to chimps and bonobos. Both of which are omnivores.
I do have some zoology training which is why I'm aware that animal protein (primarily insects) forms only an infrequent and small part of chimpanzee diets (primarily adult males) and that the contribution of animal protein to bonobo diets is marginal. I'm not sure how the consumption of primarily insect protein by chimps and bonobos is solid evidence that humans NEED to eat meat but I'd be interested to hear your interpretation.
Large animals with less need for intelligence are herbivores. Smarter and smaller animals tend to be omni/carnivores.
You mean like gorillas and elephants? I hear they're quite bright actually. And grizzly bears and chimps consume no animal protein for much of the year and can survive perfectly well without animal protein - do you think their intelligence fluctuates with their dietary preferences?
Of course, when you mix small and herbivorous you simply get failure.
Yes well if we use reproduction as a measure of dietary success (as you did with pandas) then rabbits seem a bit of an exception to that unfounded opinion don't they?
I don't wish to be rude but if your intention is to demonstrate the role of meat consumption in intelligence, you're not especially convincing