This is where I struggle with the debate:
Step 1. Call feminists angry, bitter man-haters who live in echo chambers and are entirely entrenched in our views, which are wrong anyway.
Step 2. Berate us for not engaging sufficiently or being nice enough. Like step 1 never happened.
Does that approach usually pay dividends in any other debate?
As for whether there is a particular brand of good, MN approved feminism, and all other kinds get sneered at...where I see the debate come unstuck is that at its heart liberal feminism only seems to look at the choice of the individual and whether any action as a result of that choice "empowers" a woman. There's no analysis in that. It's a hollow rhetoric, it's very easy to believe in because there's no substance to it, and it doesn't question anything about the environment that shaped the choice, the consequences if every woman made the same choice, or what that pattern of choosing might say about the society we live in. That's what makes the argument from "choice" and "equality" frustrating, not just in feminism, but in many other political movements - if you don't join the dots about all these women just happening to make these choices in these particular patterns, then you've got no analysis, and you've got no momentum to change anything...