However, I have to say that anyone saying having a few glasses of beer or wine is no different to snorting cocaine or smoking pot is seriously deluded.
In most cases, having a few glasses of wine several times a week isn't going to cause any real harm, or lead to anything further. Smoking cannabis or snorting coke will invariably lead to harder drugs for many, and it's outrageously ignorant and narrow minded to suggest that won't happen.
But here's the thing, when you present a skewed dichotomy by insisting that cocaine be juxtaposed with "two cocktails" or "a couple of glasses of wine" you must know deep down that they are much more comparable than you prefer to admit. Otherwise why keep trying to minimise the alcohol intake in these examples? Habitual misuse of alcohol is absolutely comparable to the habitual misuse of other drugs.
As for your second paragraph, can you back up the claim that most people who drink alcohol do so with no harm or without it leading to anything further? 90% of the population have tried alcohol, compared to under 50% cannabis and 16% cocaine. I would bet that for the majority of cases alcohol was the first drug tried, leading onto other drugs like cannabis and cocaine.
Can you also back up your claim that cannabis and cocaine "invariably" lead to harder drugs? You see, if everyone who tried cannabis invariably ended up using harder drugs, wouldn't the statistics for harder drug use be much closer to that of cannabis?
As you yourself are opposed to ignorant narrow mindedness I hope you will respond to my post reasonably and address what appear to be fallacies in your argument.