Surely I can't be the only person who is completely baffled by this whole concept of inciting people to different parts of your wedding????
@notcontent no it's not just you who thinks it's odd to invite people to different parts of your wedding. As someone said upthread, people should invite EVERYone, even if it's just punch and snacks in the local social club, rather than Class A, Class B, and Class shite guests...
A few people have said that it's 'common in their culture' to go and see someone married in the local Church, and then just go to the night do later. Apparently, many people go to watch the couple get married, but don't go to the reception, but then go to the night do.
Well yeah, that was probably a 'thing' pre-1980's, or in old-fashioned country hick villages where everyone knows everyone, and the Church is 5-15 minutes walk from most people who are going.
But it's a different story when the guests invited only to the ceremony and the night do, are travelling 100's of miles, being expected to pay for travel, accommodation, and a gift for the couple, and the couple haven't got the decency to cater for them, and make them feel part of the wedding. And on top of that, they are made to wait around for 5 or 6 hours with nothing to do, until they are 'allowed' into the night do. I would feel like a fucking second class citizen if someone did this to me!
It's fine to pop to the local Church to see a local couple get married, and then pop to the village hall for the night do a few hours later. But being dragged 100s of miles away to see the ceremony, then being excluded from the reception, and having to hang around in a strange town for 5 or 6 hours, while the first-class guests get to eat a 3 or 4 course meal, with drinks and seating, and warmth and hospitality included, is completely different. You are basically treating the 'Ceremony and night-do only' guests like shit.