But Bertrand, really? That latest example is even more baffling. Religion is a personal thing and sometimes people who declare themselves as non-religious, have a change of heart. Are you saying that they're not entitled to do that?
What was this man doing? Dragging his hitherto non-churching going partner to church with ecclesiastical enthusiasm or did he just expect her to absorb the news and leave him to quietly go off to church when he wanted to?
I've also see you as a fiercely feminist poster, Bertrand and your posts really do make me think (in a good way!) but I'm baffled that you would think there is anything creditable in making your partner suffer or feel 'less than' for a change of heart?
If, in any of these examples, there was any evidence of brainwashing of the partner then that would be a totally different ballgame but there isn't, is there? If anything, it's the woman-end of the partnership that is dictating how things are to be - or ELSE.
That isn't feminism to me, it's tacit bullying and I want no part of it. If my husband does things that impact me then we'll have a conversation about it and respectfully decide where we go from there but I won't be moved by gaggles of posters saying, "I'd divorce him!" and seeking validation for their pious nonsense.
People have inalienable rights as part of the Constitution of America... even Trump has signed up to that ffs!