Well, I am quite relaxed in that I'm not panicking Cross, that does no good. I refuse to live in terror because of all this.
I think you are underestimating the damage this terrorism does, not just to all those killed and injured and their loved ones but to all of us. You seem to feel it is some kind of moral badge of honour that you are relaxed. I really find that hard to understand.
And that's not a huge number compared to what it could be.
Will you be not relaxed when it's 40,000 or 60,000? What's your threshold for when you think having people within our communities who want to wreak havoc on their own towns and cities is worth being a bit disturbed about?
From what I can tell, the reason those 3,000 are distinguished from the larger number is because those are the ones judged to be the real threats. Those are the ones you should be concerned about
Okay. All fine. Lee Rigby's murderer, not on the active (currently 3000) list.
Westminster attacker, not on the active list.
Manchester bomber, not on the active list.
But obviously you have greater knowledge and can categorically state that we only need to worry about the 3000 on the list.