Having been both a SAHM (for first three years) and now working full-time, I don't judge anyone for their choices. But, the thing that often strikes me, when I look at women who haven't returned to the workforce, or whose career has been stymied by maternity leave is that, a lot of the time, and for a lot of women, the element of choice really isn't there.
It's hard to make a free, unimpeded choice when society tends to assume (and I'd say this thread largely reflects that assumption) that the individual in a couple who should sacrifice their career is the mother. In my opinion, this assumption (and the way it's reinforced in parental leave options, etc) underpins SO many of the mothering vs career 'choices' contemporary women make, and it pisses me off.
In my opinion, a free choice about which you want - SAHM or WOHM - is only available when there are no societal pressures or biases one way or the other. If there was shared parental leave; if we had less socially engrained expectation that men were going to be the main breadwinner; if women had greater expectations of equal pay - ie if we were closer to a level playing field of gender equality - THEN we might begin talking about 'choice'. But, in so many situations the default option is that the woman stays home.
Okay, for some people the current set-up and expectations work out fine. People make choices and are happy to bear the guilt, or the judgement or whatever. But I think it's utterly abysmal that some women have defaulted on a career or vocation simply because (by absorbing subtle social expectations) they have just never seen the satisfactions of those levels of ambition as something that applies to them, or that they could aspire to if they wished.
I fully get that this doesn't quite apply to the OP. It has just always bugged me that all of this guilt or concern over career vs home has been seen as (almost) solely the domain of women.
Rant over! 