^ What Dear Little said.
AFAIK there hasn't been a single poster ob this thread who has even implied that rape isn't solely the rapist's fault.
However, as with any crime, people are warned to minimise the risks.
We could aim campaigns at the rapists, but apart from a few of the more "blurry" scenarios, will they listen?
We happily tell people to not meet strangers in private when OLD, to lock their doors etc. We tell children not to go with people they don't know. We warn potential victims how to minimise the risks of fraud, hacking, theft, violence and so on.
In none of those instances is this "advice" considered victim-blaming. And we don't warn the perpetrators not to do it, because they'll likely do it regardless.
Why should rape be any different?
If someone I was close to was planning to get blind drunk, then walk alone down a dark alley, I would warn them of the risks. I shouldn't have to, and they shouldn't have to consider it. And I'd something were to happen, that doesn't make it n any way their fault. But you can't deny those risks are increased in certain situations.
That being said, I do know that rape is different, because people do blame the victims. I don't know what the solution is, and we do need to change attitudes to rape, however I don't feel that pretending there aren't situations where you may be more vulnerable is the way to go.