WoodPigeonInFlight
Some nutter on the internet means nothing. You are however aligning yourself with a another very popular youtuber called Bearing who likes to make video arguments towards SJWs and Feminists (the type who do normal feminists no favours). I discovered all of them on my phone when my laptop died so I couldn't work but I had free wifi on a long flight.
A list of individual acts is likewise fairly insignificant like someone (or a small number) objecting to people wearing pussy hats. FWIW, that was pretty gross as were placards 'taking back' the word 'cunt'.
I know nothing about the other thing you mentioned (lesbian talk being stopped) but again, these are minority occurrences. Lots of feminists do things I suspect that you don't want to be aligned with but that doesn't mean they are all bad.
morningrunner
I don't worry about being attacked on the internet 
Really what's the big deal if a transwoman uses the women's toilets or changing rooms - they are women after all!
I wouldn't have a problem if a genuine transwoman wanted to share a women's toilet. They're cubicles anyway. I might do a doubletake if I saw feet in the next cubicle with toes pointing toward the bowl whilst they pee'd.
I'm fairly 'meh' about changing rooms too but I am a drop-the-towel-and-get-dressed person as opposed to ridiculously trying to do it all and hold a towel around myself too. I suspect that transwomen rather avoid being seen with their meat and two veg hanging out too.
Women's refuges are about the only aspect I have read about that I understand is a tricky subject. As I said, each life is as important as the next. Women in these places are lowest of the low and their feelings should be spared as opposed to making one transperson feel accepted there.
A single weightlifter isn't the start of the end of women in sports, nor is Caster Semenya.
So, no, I don't see what the big deal is. I think transwomen with malicious or questionable intent are so, so, so few that important things should be being discussed instead. Huntly, for example, should simply be shot. As that isn't allowed any more, if s/he is going to be housed with similar child abusers of either sex or gender, I don't really care too much what happens to any of them - not enough to make me forget more pressing issues.
I think that a transwoman police officer would be last in line for training for rape case handling. Transwomen would struggle to get whatever training or certification or a job based on it as a sexual assualt evidence taker too. This is not discrimination in my eyes. This is due to practicalities of employment.
No, I don't think they are women because they want to be. I think they are in the wrong body. They have a brain which tells them they should have been in a female body. They're a 3rd category.
tl;dr
I don't think trans people are eroding women's rights.
I don't think they're real women.
I think that calling them dangerous is disingenuous and statistically they need help more than to be treated with fear.
I can think of very, very few cases where their transness is is an issue. In certain areas of employment they could be held back but I see this no different as me not getting a role in customer services because I'm bolshy and struggle to bite my tongue.