Adam SchiffVerified account @RepAdamSchiff 5h5 hours ago
More
So @POTUS makes it known that he holds important meetings with foreign leaders at Mar-A-Lago, then raises the cost of joining. Hmmmm….
Guests at Mar-A-Lago brag about being close to action, post photos of guy with nuclear codes. It is quite literally $$$ for access to @POTUS
.@POTUS says he paid for hosting Shinzo Abe at the Mar-A-Lago. Maybe. But undoubtedly far less than he’s profiting from the increased dues.
Every major news outlet reports on Trump's meetings – and mention Mar-A-Lago. Trump also gets free press for his hotel on America's dime.
Trump used Mar-A-Lago dining room as open air Situation Room to discuss response North Korea missile launch. Still sounds crazy to type out!
This is just one property, one project, one ethical quagmire. Conflicts exist w/ practically every Trump family property. Wake up @HouseGOP.
Many of these conflicts put the President in direct conflict with the Emoluments Clause. See @tribelaw analysis: www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/dec/19/donald-trump-violate-us-constitution-inauguration-day …)
Because @POTUS is a walking, talking violation of the Emoluments Clause, profound questions arise that the Clause was meant to avoid, like:
Did China finally grant trademarks to Trump family after ten years, because @POTUS agreed to the "One China" policy?
Did @POTUS exclude certain countries from his Muslim ban because the Trumps are seeking or have real estate deals there?
Is the President putting America first, or the Trump family fortune?