Caroline O. @RVAwonk 49m49 minutes ago
More
HEADS UP -> HHS Sec. Tom Price just left the door open to using "conscience clauses" to allow insurers to deny contraceptive coverage. 1/
At the WH daily briefing, he mentioned the issue of making sure health policies don't "violate consciences." 2/
Price was asked specifically if he was referring only to abortion, or if he also meant contraception. 3/
He avoided answering directly, but he DID NOT say that contraceptive coverage would be protected. 4/
He's not just talking abt ACA's contraceptive mandate. He's talking abt letting insurers deny ALL coverage of BC. 5/
Price has voted in the past to allow insurers to use "conscience clauses" to deny coverage of contraception. 6/
www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/12/trumps-new-hhs-secretary-tried-curb-contraceptive-access …
Tom Price's support for conscience clauses would also allow doctors/providers to deny repro health care based on their religious beliefs. 7/
In early Feb, a leaked EO draft suggested Trump might expand conscience clauses to allow denial of birth control. 8/ twitter.com/RVAwonk/status/827191757762916352 …
In Feb, @thehill reported that Tom Price was working behind the scenes to eliminate contraceptive coverage. 9/ twitter.com/RVAwonk/status/834371784820551680 …
Let's talk about some of the implications if Tom Price & GOP move forward with this... 10/
Pre-ACA, reproductive-age women spent abt 68% more on out-of-pocket costs than men, mostly b/c of birth control. 11/ www.guttmacher.org/sites/default/files/article_files/gr010405.pdf …
Birth control isn't cheap. Pre-ACA, BC comprised abt 1/3 of out-of-pocket spending 4 women of childbearing age. 12/
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14768985