Wankers - perhaps take a look at UKIP, sounds to me like that's the party who will agree with your horror at having to have polish food in a British supermarket (shockshockshockshockshock). And you are calling the inclusive, welcoming SNP racist. Aye, ok.
To be fair, I think it was fairly clear that Wankers feels no horror at having Polish food in the supermarket. She's merely saying that having Polish food in the shops is the virtually the only impact we feel up here from European immigration, because the vast majority of it goes to England, and I think that point is fair enough. Immigration isn't something that impacts me either, but I do recognise that it's a lot easier to cry "racist" for objecting to uncontrolled immigration if you're not seeing any of your services stretched by increased demand. I assume "inclusive, welcoming SNP" is ironic; how welcoming are they towards the English or the Tories?
They slag off Trump (rightfully I add) but think it's okay for them to be "Scotland First" while slagging his "America First" policy. However the fact remains that we need to find a way of dealing with him. It's also all wrong to be jumping up and down about him visiting when we've welcomed visits from all sorts of horrid individuals.
I think this is spot on. Trump may be a lunatic, but we have to deal with him, and his affection for the UK means that our PM has the chance to exert influence over him, and has already secured a commitment towards NATO, with much gratitude from various European states. It's simply childish to say that because someone is a nasty individual we want nothing to do with them when that person happens to be the democratically elected leader of our greatest trading partner and ally. (Especially when much worse, unelected leaders have been welcomed in the past.) There are also clear parallels between Trump's 'America first' stance and the SNPs 'Scotland first' rhetoric (even if it dressed up in flowery language about fighting austerity - while implementing policies that benefit the better off), which you could actually argue are fair enough in both cases (because they're serving their electorate). To pretend otherwise is to ignore reality.