itunscrewstherway What you said is true (according to the article),
"The article says that more reports of DV are made by women (against men), but that reports made by men against women are more likely to lead to arrest. Happy to be correct, but that's how it reads to me."
and that is what the article says in essence...
"Men are responsible for most cases of domestic violence, but women are three times more likely to be arrested for incidents of abuse, research reveals today."
My point was that if men were not reporting 'abuse' (for whatever reason) then how could so many women be arrested for it. The evidence seems to be that men are more likely to report any abuse or any physical violence. If men are much less likely to be the victim of violence yet still women are more likely to be arrested this seems to show men have no reason to be fearful of reporting.
There are so many other factors in this, like men probably being a lot less fearful of losing their home, income etc. And men being more likely to be repeat offenders...
"Some 83% of men had at least two incidents recorded; one man had 52. In contrast, 62% of women recorded as perpetrators had only one incident recorded, and the highest number of repeat incidents for any woman was eight."
and
"Men's violence tended to create a "context of fear and control", the researchers said, whereas women were more likely to use verbal abuse or some physical violence."
Anyway, enough of this, do not want to de-rail!