Oh come one.
Ou lot are really harsh on that guy.
The Op's brother DID go to court to get access to his child. He IS involved in his child life and is paying maintenance. He IS planning ahead for his son and is saving money for him, for the future, whatever it could be.
So what are all saying?
That he should also move town to be closer to his child. Because finding another job is just as easy as that isn't it?
That he should fight with the Courts so that, what? He has the child full time and his mother only EOW because she is living with a rapist? Even though SS have evaluated that the situation is OK? Because it's all so easy and no you are never allowed to be feel downbeat by it?
I suspect that you are all up in arms saying he didn't try hard enough when actually the issue is that this guy tried but YES it is harder for a father to get 50/50 or full care of his son when he never had him full time with him (by default, they separated when the mother was pg).
That he should have been going round nursery, GPs etc... To check that he is named as the father. Because, of course, the default assumption should be that the mother can't be trusted (I'm sure a lot of mothers here would be delighted if their ex was doing that
)...
OP I'm not sure what is the rigth answer to that.
- Re the child calling his step father 'daddy'', I'm not sure he can do a lot. As some posters pointed out, he might have done that because he is copying his sibling, because he has been told to do so, because he chose to do so.
What your Dbro can do is to explain the difference between a 'daddy' and a 'father' and explain that he will
ALWAYS be his father, that it is something that will never ever change as well as explaining the blood link between them. Maybe too, if that's the reality, about how as his father, he very much wanted a child and that's why he is here.
What he can't do is to go down there route of 'I love you more than Him' or 'I'm more important than him' because that guy will be a very big part of his son's life.
- re how much time he is spending with him, I think he needs to think carefully about how much he wants to be involved with his son and get some good, strong legal advice. Courts will not have been happy to leave the child with him, even 50/50 when he was a baby but this is not the case anymore so can be reviewed. As to how much time he can get with his son, I'm not sure but that's what a SHL (shit hot lawyer) can tell him.