This thread continues apace ...
Funny lifts being mentioned. The Glee Club in Birmingham is only accessible via a lift. We went there last year (never again), and the staff had to clear loads of chairs out of the way before we could get into the lift.
When you consider that "The Glee Club" is a highly profitable chain of venues, it's clear they have no interest in accessibility. Which was no surprise really, since they make no mention of it on their website (not that that's unusual in itself).
What makes me want to cry (one day I may - sod growing old with dignity) is that we're back to the 80/20 rule. Addressing 20% of the issues would massively help 80% of the people.
As a basic example. The single most useful "adaptation" a disabled driver would find useful, is an automatic gearbox. Given that, you'd think that the Motability scheme would treat that as a basic provision, and it would not incur a cost.
I hope no-one bet on that. Because they'd lose - many automatics on the motability scheme require additional payment
.
Recently, we visited a Costa which has 2 disabled bays provided. Both were free when we arrived (we wheeled from a nearby supermarket where we did have parking, as you'd have to be start staring mad [or have no choice
to leave a parking space you have, on the off chance another will be free). As we left, I noticed one of their suppliers had parked their van in one of the bays.
I duly photographed it, and sent it to Costa, and the company involved.
No reply from company.
"Oh dear" from Costa.
Now, if it were I, at Costa, then the supplier would have lost their contract, because I would have written into it a clause that cuntish behaviour by any of their drivers would be grounds for termination. (I would actually use that wording. I like the idea of a court declaring that so-and-so "acted like a cunt").
Of course that used up valuable energy which now can't be used towards caring for my wife. You have to choose your battles.