you are utterly clueless as to just how difficult it is to manage long term with children alone.
My divorce settlement bought me a house - outright. I have no mortgage but I do have three children to support. As a result of choices I made prior to knowing my ex and directly as a result of choices we made as a couple, I will never be able to make up a full pension pot. I am throwing as much as I can at it but it won't be enough. I have a brand new car on the driveway not because I am trying to prove some kind of point but because it was interest free for 4 years, had an additional discount due to my professional subscriptions, came with servicing, breakdown, tax etc. for the full 4 years and when evened out compared with the cost of a mid-range used car and finanance, costs me no more. There is then the added bonus of not having to worry about it breaking down, the taxis to and from work, the being late to work etc. with no car because being on my own, there is no one to help me juggle that.
There are few issues that can't be solved in life by throwing money at them. So that's what I do. Bathroom cabinet falls off the wall? Handyman comes in to fix it. Sure, I could do it myself, except I can't lift the bloody thing and my children are not really yet of an age where they can help and there's always the worry of not really knowing what I'm doing so it's better to get a professional in or one of us could end up dead. So that's another £50 down the drain. And so on. And so on.
As for the idiot who says you don't downsize a house that is paid off...utter rubbish. A family home is too big for one person. It requires massive upkeep and the older the house, the more the upkeep is. Smaller houses have a need for a smaller (cheaper) boiler, less of a garden to maintain, new windows are smaller (cheaper), new roof is smaller (cheaper) etc. etc. There is no way I will be able to maintain our family home long term and there is no way whatsoever, I can be putting money away for my children's futures at the current time. Or I could, but we would never have any kind of luxury and I make no apologies for wanting a week in the sun every now and then or just to feel that it is worth working for a living and making a few decent memories with my children. Or what's the point?
On the face of it, my ex's new partner could sit here, from her ivory tower of two full time wages and support to manage her household and say 'but she got everything' (I didn't) and why hasn't she put money away because she earns decent money (which I do)?' And yes, I choose to have a holiday and yes, I buy the odd takeaway or a bottle of wine but fucking hell, I work for a living and need some down time, just like everyone else. In the big scheme of thing, a takeaway pizza and a couple of bottles of wine every month isn't going to put 3 children through uni, is it?!
I am not denying that the ex in this case may have behaved badly. I really do get that. But what I can't stand is the 'she should have done this and that' bollox that gets pulled out time and time again by people who are fucking clueless as to the realities of long-term single-dom with children. It's really not that simple. Be angry with her for lying about not supporting the children but the rest of it is total rubbish. You can't know her financial situation, you can't know how easy or how difficult things may have been, and you can't know whether her situation today is as a result of her excessive spending or just trying to make ends meet.
And I say it again, if this were a couple saying they needed to downsize post-children, would anyone even think to question what they had been doing with their money all these years?