You, Fontella. You're a charlatan, with your tarot reading. Wasn't that clear?
Nope, not clear at all. And who are you to to accuse me or anyone else on this thread of anything?
Who am I being a 'charlatan' to exactly? What claims am I making, who am I deceiving, who am I conning, what fakery am I exhibiting, what lies am I telling?
NONE is the answer to all those questions and you have no right whatsoever to suggest otherwise with your ad hominem attack, which as far as I am aware, is completely against the rules on this forum.
What I am is a scholar and a sceptic contributing to a thread about a fake 'psychic' and an upset OP. I hate fakery in all its form and have visited over 20 so-called psychics in the course of my research and written nearly 1,000 pages of notes ... and my conclusion is, it's all bollocks.
I've never charged anyone a penny for anything, and never claimed to have any powers of any description so how I am 'worse' than the £35 charging lying faker the OP went to see' I'm not quite sure?
But as an open minded individual who doesn't believe that 2016 science has all the answers to everything, I'm not willing to write off the Tarot itself, which is an entirely different thing to fakers claiming to be able to predict the future. It's a 500 year old entirely innocent card game with beautiful imagery that has been hijacked by the occult and it's a fascinating and often surprising study that continues to hold my interest.
How that makes me a charlatan I'm not quite sure - but carry on with your ad hominem comments and I won't hesitate to report you.