I'm baffled by the responses here.
I've seen previous threads where:
people have shrugged their shoulders at two thirteen year old having sex.
People have said to a mother who's 14 year old daughter was having sex with her 17 boyfriend, to make sure it was safe and allow it under her roof
Posters talk proudly of the active sex lives they enjoyed at the age of 13.
Some people on here would have no problem with a 16 year old re-enacting the Karma Sutra every night with a similarly aged boyfriend/girlfriend and would be very harsh towards any parent who didn't think it was a good idea.
So therefore I'm baffled by the idea that it's ok for teenagers to be sexual beings (even regardless of the age of consent according to some) but only with someone their own age.
Do I think it is wise or sensible to get involved with a 16year old, no.
I agree that such an age gap can lead to a power imbalance.
But it's not legally wrong and it certainly doesn't make the OP a paedophile.
I also think if the OP was a mother talking about her teenage daughter, she would have had a very different response.