Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

about SIL breastfeeding issue? Wedding related!

999 replies

SilverSalmon · 05/05/2015 13:08

I'm getting married in 5 weeks and there'll be 6 children at the wedding - 2 small babies and 4 toddlers. Next to the room where we're getting married is another room they use for smaller ceremonies, I asked if they could leave the door open for this in case people need to take out crying/tantrumming children (including my own 4yo DS!). They've agreed and will put sofas and a toy box in the room.

We were at my OH's parents at the weekend and his DB and wife were there. They are bringing their 2 children, our niece (4 months) and nephew (3yo) to the wedding. I told her about the room and said that I can get them sat near it just in case they need to pop out and settle or feed them (she's breastfeeding both). She said that if they need to feed she can just pull her dress down as its low cut, but I said she'll probably be more comfortable in the room as the seats are squahsed close together and may incur a lot of faffing. I've said the same to my cousin who is bring her 2 month old, who is bottle fed (and told SIL-to-be this).

Can I state at this point I'm very pro-breastfeeding, i breastfed DS until he was 2 years old, often in public, and would never ever adopy a 'there's a time and a place' attitude - however having breastfed a child of varying ages I know what a faff it can be especially when they're across your lap when someone is right next to you, so I gave the room idea as I thought it would be more comfortable for them and the children.

This morning OH has received the following email from his DB (names changed obviously):

Hi DB
Laura (SIL-to-be) and I have been discussing the issue of breastfeeding at your wedding and the fact she's been asked to go into another room if she needs to feed during the ceremony. I have to say I'm disappointed in you both as I thought you were pro-breastfeeding. Laura feels very vicitimised by this and we suspect it's because other guests may feel uncomfortable. In which case that's their issue, if they are offended by breasts being used for their natural function then they are welcome to turn their heads. Or, if it's like SilverSalmon says, and it's just for our comfort, we believe it would be easier to just get the children latched on rather than make the fuss of getting up and leaving the room.

I think it may be a good time to also mention that, as you know, Laura tandem feeds and because DS is still feeding when she latches DD on he usually comes up asking for some too. Meaning that it's highly likely that she'll need to tandem feed at various points during the day. We're happy with this and she has chosen a tandem-feeding friendly dress for this reason. Laura is not prepared to be shoved into a side room like she's doing something sordid, she wants to be part of the day too. So wether it be during the ceremony, dinner, speeches etc, she will need to tandem feed and is not prepared to leave the room to do it. I have to put the comfort and needs of my wife and children first. If you're not happy with this arrangement I'm afraid we won't be able to come - I'm not having any of us penalised because of our feeding choices. None of us would enjoy a day where the children and Laura are constantly seperate from me and the feeding is non-negotiable. It's up to you 2 but can you let us know asap and then we do things like cancel the hotel room and return our outfits. I hope you understand our point of view, I don't want to fall out with you but I didn't think breastfeeding would be such an issue!"

So mumsnet AIBU to be upset about this? I genuinely thought I was being helpful when I offered a side room for the ceremony. Help!

OP posts:
DownWithThisTypeOfThing · 07/05/2015 13:03

Momagain1

Thank god this will hit 1000 posts soon.

If all the repetition was taken out it would've died off at about 200 posts.

NutellaNutter · 07/05/2015 13:04

Would like to see what the SIL has to say!

balletnotlacrosse · 07/05/2015 13:08

In fairness Leedy, you've been quite aggressive and shouty yourself on this thread.

leedy · 07/05/2015 13:13

Merely exasperated, I thought. I'm quite nice really.

quietasamouse · 07/05/2015 13:18

Twenty more to go....

chaletdays · 07/05/2015 13:28

Nineteen now.

quietasamouse · 07/05/2015 13:30
Grin
purdiepie · 07/05/2015 13:30

If you don't like how the thread has panned out then dfod.

I agree about Leedy being imperious and dogmatic throughout. Reading her posts is like being shouted at by the Daily Mail.

leedy · 07/05/2015 13:34

Aww, this is as good as when my school careers teacher told me I was "arrogant and obnoxious and would spend the rest of my life trampling over people to get what I wanted". I'll add "imperious and dogmatic" to the CV, then.

Never been likened to the Fail, though. That's a first.

(also clearly my attempts at irked humour don't always come across properly. Oh well.)

leedy · 07/05/2015 13:35

(nobody thought the bit about the Goat People From Beyond The Stars was funny? Just me then?)

tbtc · 07/05/2015 13:35

My 3 year old pooed his pants during my sister's wedding. Reckon that was worse than BF him tbh.

just trying to help the thread reach 1000

CultureSucksDownWords · 07/05/2015 13:36

If you don't like reading some of the posts on this thread then you could follow your own advice purdeypie.

chaletdays · 07/05/2015 13:37

Wow! What prompted her to say that Leedy? Shock

UnspecialSnowflake · 07/05/2015 13:42

One of my nephews projectile vomited during the speeches at my step sisters wedding, worst of all he did it all over the mother of the bride.

Shelby2010 · 07/05/2015 13:42

It's also interesting that the negative comments made about bf a toddler in public (ie. 'shocking', make you feel 'queasy', 'not the time or place') are the same as you'd have heard not so very long ago if a mother wanted to bf her newborn in a restaurant or other public place. Now most MNetters would be up in arms if anyone tried to shuffle mother & newborn off to a sideroom or, in the old days, a toilet! A bit more tolerance wouldn't go amiss on this thread.

But the BIL does sound like a right dick.

leedy · 07/05/2015 13:43

"What prompted her to say that Leedy?"

It was really bizarre - we didn't have an up to date Cambridge prospectus in the careers library so I'd phoned the university myself for one, used it for college applications, and then ages later she asked me to bring it in for the library. I then turned up in school without it the next day, she asked where it was, I pointed out that a) it was mine, and b) applications were over and it'd be out of date for next year anyway but I'd bring it in the following day. She then went ballistic.

Oh, and she sent me to the principal, who looked a bit bemused and told me that I should probably avoid the careers teacher in future.

THIS IS THE KIND OF FORMATIVE EXPERIENCE THAT MADE ME THE MILITANT BREASTFEEDER THAT I AM. Or something.

MerryMarigold · 07/05/2015 13:49

yet no child ever needs to be BF as there are always alternatives.

Not in my case. None of them would take a bottle!

quietasamouse · 07/05/2015 13:51

This thread has made me adamant I'll have a child free wedding!

DuelingFanjo · 07/05/2015 13:59

'yet no child ever needs to be BF as there are always alternatives'

The alternatives are not as healthy as the biological norm. No parent should be forced to use an alternative just because it's there.

Goldmandra · 07/05/2015 14:06

The alternatives are not as healthy as the biological norm. No parent should be forced to use an alternative just because it's there.

I couldn't agree more. I was just pointing out how ridiculous it is to say that a toddler doesn't need to be BF in order to justify preventing them from doing so. Nobody should ever have to justify BFing their child.

DixieNormas · 07/05/2015 14:13

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

DownWithThisTypeOfThing · 07/05/2015 14:16

quietasamouse
This thread has made me adamant I'll have a child free wedding!

I'd have the children no bother, just not BIL and Laura!

TheNewStatesman · 07/05/2015 14:19

I wouldn't call tandem feeding the biological norm. In the kind of societies where humans evolved, the toddler would almost certainly have been weaned when the mother got pregnant for the second time.

quietasamouse · 07/05/2015 14:19
Grin
New posts on this thread. Refresh page