This stuff is interesting. At one point I was quite heavily involved in trans research with a colleague (male). We got very different responses when we were approaching groups to recruit participants. If he called, they welcomed him with open arms. The minute he asked if he could bring a cis woman colleague, we were both turned down flat. It took a few rounds before we realised that the researchers were being biased against, lol.
Which is a shame, because as individuals, we had an awful lot of people who wanted to take part in our study so that they could explore their own realities. A lot of these were young people still in school.
In all honesty, I applaud your friend for being the one who is trying to make lgbt less of an issue for youth. But I am always fascinated by this insistence that people having first hand experience is the only possible route to empathy and support.
The first essay I had to write at university was on a similar theme - and I caught myself out as I had experience of the subject matter, and wrote a long tirade about the importance of experience and sincerity etc etc blah blah bollocks. Of course, I have grown up now, and realise that experience, thankfully, is not the be all and end all. But it's an easy trap to fall into when you knee jerk and don't consider carefully.
My son's best friend is trans. As a 13yo, he is just experiencing some of the issues related to this subject, in a tight knit catholic school. I would love for there to be a volunteer who could go in and address the school community, whatever their own personal demographic.
We are heavily involved in youth disability groups (dd2 has a disability). Whilst the group has a remit to help participants eventually become volunteers in their own right, we also have a vast number of volunteers with no experience of different abilities themselves.
Is it the fact she's getting paid to be knowledgeable about the subject? When you feel intrinsically more knowledgeable, and aren't?
Sometimes filthy lucre can sway our thinking, lol...