I don't know exactly what point I was making except women read, buy or work for newspapers but don't necessarily subscribe to the whole thing. In fact, it's naive and patronising to think they would.
I also find it insulting to think they should do so and then to use that argument to dismiss their concerns about a particular feature or pretend they don't exist.
Jane Moore was forging a TV career at the time and swooped on the issue of the moment which was body image in women's magazines. Fair enough. I thought she'd be up for debate or at least have a sense of irony or humour. How wrong I was 
I still got paid, which is an important thing in this house.
I have a copy of the Daily Mail today because I like the TV guide. I don't like their politics or entire world view.
But I don't like The Sun's politics either but I used to read it for Ally Ross's sublime TV column because I like telly and he made me laugh.
I'd also read it on Saturdays for their White Van Man feature in which they'd question the drivers of white vans on the issues of the week. If you've never read it, it was wonderfully subversive, and the views expressed were not what you might imagine from the title of the feature. I don't know how it got in there but thankfully it's been stamped out
Their entertainment listings are good, as are their health features, but I'm not that fussed. I'm not here to defend The Sun. I just dislike the idea that The Sun is a comic or not a newspaper. It has news and you don't have to like the whole thing to acknowledge that.
I know people who read the Mail's sports section, and also those in the Telegraph and Times, but throw away the rest.
No one expects them to sign up to those papers' entire editorial position or defend individual features because they like one section. But perhaps that's because they are men.
And, yes, I do know women like sport too. I sometimes read the sports features myself. And not just for the hunky bods.