I cant understand how people dont say anything if you are being fleeced out of extra money.
Really? When comments on here, including the actual OP include:
A couple of us said 'Look, we'll just split it. Less complicated' but they insisted on doing the 'Susan didn't have a starter. John had a beer before the rest of us got here' stuff. AIBU to think this is incredibly petty?
Yes it is unbelievably petty. We split bills evenly by the number of couples and the one couple who wanted to do the "X didn't have a starter but Y had 3 rolls" were quietly dropped from our invitations.
Every time, one person would have soup and one glass of wine and then complain at the end that they didn't want to split it, they'd only had soup, it was too much money etc etc. It was so fucking tedious and awkward.
Getting calculators out and passing the bill round while everyone discusses what they had just spoils a pleasant night out. It is just tacky and awkward.
Clearly there are people for whom someone wanting to pay just for what they had is a huge problem. I am not going to suggest that the posters on this thread actively expect others to subsidise their meal choices, but the other anecdotes on here suggest that there are many people who either deliberately or unintentionally land others with bills which come to much more than their fair share and are happy to do so because they feel that they have paid about the right amount.
If you are strapped for cash, or usually end up having a cheaper meal through preference, then being accused of tackiness, tediousness and pettiness is one of the potential alternatives to forking out for other peoples' food time and time again. It's frustrating because it's a lose-lose situation, not least because anyone who doesn't realise that it's far tackier to expect others to subsidise your meal is probably not someone I would choose to dine with which means a work event or other enforced social function where you really resent paying for some tight-wad's cocktails and fillet steak.