I think a young, inexperienced, man who has been told all his life that unless and until he hears "no" he can put his penis wherever he chooses, is potentially (to my mind at least) more decent than a man who deliberately coerces women and ignores explicit "no".
If that young man does something he had been raised to think is OK, he becomes a rapist.
The rape is not excusable because of the messages he has been getting. Ideally he wouldn't even feel inclined to "have sex" with a woman who wasn't into it.
But I think we need to acknowledge that we (as a society) have been raising our boys to be rapists (or potential rapists) for decades.
The prevalence of sexual violence against women speaks to a level of acceptance that is entirely at odds with the official story of "most men" reviling "rapists".
The truth is that the performed fury at sex offenders functions to narrowly define what a rapist can be.
How many women up and down the country last night "had sex" when they were too drunk to consent? felt unable to say no because they were scared or intimidated? were "surprised" when a penis found its way into an orifice that wasn't expecting it? were asleep?
More than a handful, I would imagine. That kind of experience is not rare.
Every one of those women was raped.
And for every rape there is a rapist, many of whom don't have the faintest idea of what they did.
And if ever confronted, they will talk about "crying rape" and "changing minds" and morning after "regret".
But none of that changes the truth of what happened, what is happening every week, to countless women. Many of whom think it is entirely normal.