Am I being over simplistic to assume that most of the current "undecideds" are more likely to vote No? My thought process is that if you are unsure about Independence, you are likely to go with the status quo.
Interestingly (and very unscientifically) while the polls have it extremely close, the bookmakers are showing the No vote clearly in the lead. This extract from the Racing Post:
"THE polls make it too close to call but bookmakers say the weight of money piling in from big-hitting punters tells them Scotland will vote against independence on Thursday in a referendum that has potentially huge implications for the future of Scottish racing.
The odds on a 'yes' vote on Wednesday night drifted out to a top-priced 7-2 in the belief that the bulk of those still undecided will plump to remain in the Union.
Alex Donohue, spokesman for Ladbrokes, which estimates £40 million has been wagered on the contest, said: "The disparity between the polls and the market is down to more money being staked on 'no' and the fact a lot of the undecided voters cannot be reached by polling. We think those people are more likely to stick to the status quo."
All the biggest bets struck have been for 'no', with a London-based William Hill punter on Wednesday topping up his bet, originally struck in June, to £900,000, which would return a £193,333 profit if successful.
A 'no' vote was at 7.45pm on Wednesday a best-priced 1-4 shot with Betfred."