to think that mark Bridger deserves to have his "parts" removed?

[whatever2]

while he's awake hopefully?

Over the past few days I've read enough comments in the papers to not need to read yet another discussion on MN. My own comment wasn't about the general discussion, rather about the revolting nature of the original post

In that case, Im not sure anyone on this MN discussion, has any interest in your comments I certainly dont