"Even if you were right, Skippy, he's over 23"
Yes I know, I was just refuting GoldShip's statement that
"The age of consent is 16 so how is it not rape?"
Clearly the law believes that a child of 15 CAN consent, since as I explained in special circumstances it can be lawful to have sex with a child of 13, 14 or 15.
So smellslikecatpee's best friend's mate, had he not asked/had reason to question smellslikecatpee's age, would have had a defence to any charge of unlawful sexual intercourse.
Rape is not an appropriate term for this teacher.
In law it would be 'unlawful sexual intercourse' (if applicable), and/or 'abuse of a position of trust'.
I guess there are other kinds of unlawful sexual intercourse too, that would not be rape.