seeker
Flatpckhamster's selective quoting left out any reference to me acknowledging the sexual abuse of men as a reality, and any reference to the fact that I was this through as I typed.
Which does rather change the meaning and pitch of my post.
It doesn't change it at all. I left out the bit where you stated that it would be 'practically impossible' to convict a female rapist raping a man.
You claim not to mean any disrespect, but you're treating women who are raped as first class citizens, entitled to full protection from evil rapey men, and saying 'Oh, it's too hard to convict women of raping men so really, let's not bother'.
Your implication that women are the ones 'on the receiving end' of DV belittles all those beaten men, of course. And the attempts to classify DV as somehow different from day-to-day violence means that it's easy to place women as the victim, rather than accepting that men are far more likely to be injured by violence than women.
Do you not think that this Woman Is Victim mentality is counter to everything that feminism was always about? It used to be 'We can do it and we'll show everyone', now it's ""Woe is me, the evil menz are to blame for everything".
You are of course fully aware of the "powerful forces" I mean.
No, I think we'd all be interested to learn who you're talking about. The Illuminati? Reptiloids? The Masons? Zombie Nazis?