Jumpingthroughmorehoops, Double barrelled names are now a social indicator that the parents aren't married as opposed to once 'posh
We have a double-barreled surname and have been married for almost 30 years, so if you are making judgements like that you are wrong. Not that we are posh either
. I personally feel that if you don't have the commitment to each other to get married then you shouldn't be having children together, but I know that's a no-no on MN.
elephantsandmiasma I so agree with you. This stupid argument comes up again and again. My kids are all grown up and talking about getting married. They will all make their own decisions - with their new spouse - what they plan to be called. And unlike my MIL I will not make an enormous fuss and threaten to disown them if they dare to choose a different option to me :(
While I'm on a roll, the old "your father's name" chestnut comes up again and again. I spent 20 years identifying myself by my name. I've never much liked my first name but I'm very attached to my surname. It is unusual, and all the people in the UK that carry it are related to me. I also like the association of being X's DD, as my father was very well known.
My option at getting married then was to change my name, to keep my hated first name and take on an anonymous surname. I am not Mrs DHname. That is his mother's name, and the name of 2 SILs (and now a NIL as well, with more to come). His name is common, with no association to anything. So for the same reason that lots choose to lose their name, I chose to keep mine. We DB when DC1 was born.
What I find baffling is that so many women choose to have children without being married, and then give them their DP's name. Makes no sense to me at all.