interesting thread, Boffy ....
I was raised pretty much the same as you, at around the same time. I would say the physical violence did, in fact, "do me some harm" but perhaps it was more extreme than yours.
Discussions on here have prompted me to think about "Care in the Community" so I was drawn to your thread. When it started, I thought it was stupid and inhumane. Now I look around at improved disabled access in many places, at people of various ages scooting round the shops in their mobility scooters, and at the little groups of mentally handicapped people I see around town, doing things and seeming very happy. And I think I was wrong.
I was wrong to assume disabled people wouldn't live contented lives 'out here' and I was massively wrong to assume they wouldn't get enough support. I was wrong because I had zero knowledge about disability - while I was at school, children who couldn't walk were considered ineducable and stuck in homes for the '"subnormal." Adults who got severely injured went into hospital and never came out. The apparently homogeneous society I lived in was hiding up to a third of its members so I knew nothing about them.
I like the way frailty's been supported in our communities. No system is perfect; it fails sometimes but on the whole I think it's enhanced lives for both the able and the less-able.
I do think we're heading rapidly back towards a highly institutional situation - and those institutions won't be nice; they'll be cut-price boxes for getting large chunks of 'awkward' citizens out of the way. That isn't a capitalist solution; it's more closely reminiscent of Soviet policy in the USSR. It is also, though, reminiscent of fascist policies in pre-war Germany: both left and right wing, then, but socialist in both cases.
I'm not on any wing. I'm a capitalist. If the economic arguments for slicing the legs off social support were irrefutable, I'd reluctantly agree with them. But they're not. I've pointed you to a factual summary on the Frothers thread, and look forward to your reply.
I guess the question is: When you describe yourself as right-wing, Boffy, do you mean capitalist - in which case your proposition here is leaky - or do you mean you believe in forced social control - in which case right and left wings look identical?