Have only just had time to return to this thread but I will reiterate my previous comments - it is indeed true that I know several families who are milking the system and laughing at those of us who work.
With regard to the comments upthread about the chap with 'depression' playing football - he does not suffer from depression. Can you not see that was the point I was trying to make?
I know this family as the chap concerned is in a very close relationship with one of my family. He openly laughs about the way he's fiddling the system. His girlfriend used to work in the mental health field and has coached him on what to say to his GP etc.
This is just one family - there are millions milking the system in the same way. Please don't insult my intelligence by telling me otherwise.
No-one is saying that the genuinely disabled or vulnerable should not receive state help, but there is a huge benefits culture out there.
I would also question whether large families should recieve much in the way of state help. The argument that anyone can fall no hard times doesn't hold much water, frankly. However many children you have, you surely should have a back up plan in place for those unforeseen circumstances.
I am in my 50s. When I was young it was the norm to care for your family and cope without state help. And if that meant mum or dad doing two or more jobs, then so be it.
My own father struggled to better himself in later life. He managed to land a local authority job 15 miles from home but we had no car - couldn't afford one. So for the year of his employment he walked to work (we lived out in the sticks with no bus service). For a whole year he walked or thumbed a lift 15 miles to work, until he could afford a small car. Would anyone do that these days?
I am lucky enough to be a high earner and yes, I do object to paying thousands of pounds in tax to support families who failed to look to the future before having a family.