troisgarcon
The 1950s timewarp was in response to the comments along the lines of "why would he buy the cow when you get the milk for free". We are no longer in the 1950s when this idea was common. Men do not have to marry women in order to get sex, or have children. There is no social stigma to having a child "out of wedlock" as my granny would have put it.
I have utmost respect for my parents and grandparents, but have also seen aunts and uncles marry because she was pregnant and that was The Done Thing. Sometimes it worked out ok, sometimes it didn't.
Thankfully that is no longer the norm.
I also have respect for the institution of marriage, and love being married. Would I still be with my DH if he had not wanted to marry me? Yes, I would. I might not be totally happy about it, but I would still be with him.
I would however have had a frank discussion about legalities and had wills drawn up to protect me and my children in the event of something happening to him.
Mummymcar
I was talking generally. I don't doubt that your relationship is a good one, and that your DP is a good man. At the same time, it is ok to be honest with him and say, "Lets talk about a timetable. I would prefer to be married to you because I love you and want to make that commitment. If you don't want that ever then I want you to be honest and tell me that. And I want to talk about the legal steps that we can take to protect our children".
I don't really get this "not ready for it" excuse, if I am very honest, unless the couple are very young.
Having children together is a massive commitment, much much larger than a marriage certificate.
To be blunt, if I had decided two years after my marriage that I had made a mistake, I could have walked away, gotten a divorce and been done with it. After the birth of my children, that would not have been possible. It was the birth of my children that bound me to my husband for the rest of our lives, not the marriage license.