It absolutely is, but its a very dangerous sort if bizarre if you fall foul of these laws.
It is both dangerous and bizarre for a child to grow up in an atmosphere of parental "hands off" becuase he is too scared of being accused of child abuse to take part in perfectly normal contact with her.
Does anybody really think that is healthy and he should be left unchallenged to at least get his risk assessent meter recalibrated, with councelling if needs be?
I think most of the posters on this thread have never come face to face with these laws
Which speaks volumes for the micorscopically small risk involved and the extent to which a hands off policy in the family home is wildly put of proportion to the percived threat.
So far the only poster who has produced a father accused of abuse on the basis of nothing more that giving his child a bath is the OP, and even she added the modifier "as far as I know".
I can quite see why coaching and fostering have an increased risk of accusations, which makes it a bit like comparing apples and oranges using those examples to comprehend a parent's withdrawal from perfectly normal contact with his daughter when he has no reason to believe his wife, overwelmingly ststistically the most likely contender to make a false accusation, would do such a thing.
I don't think this status quo should go unchallenged and be reframed as the new "normal".
It can't be good for the man involved to lug around this exagerated fear all the time, and it sure as hell won't offer any benefits to his little girl. Becuase on some level he percieves his degree of paternal contact with her as a potential threat to his mental health, family and happiness.
She is a baby, who is being held at arms length in some contexts like she is some kind of ticking timebomb that could explode in his face if he doesn't ring fence his contact with her.
That is a big burden for such a tiny person to have thrust on her.