Christ, this has moved on a bit 
"Tethersend you once said the money you pay in tax has never been "your" money because it was never in your bank account, it goes straight out of your pay packet. So it's just communal money even though you earned it, and you have no right to an opinion, approval or objection to how it's spent, because it's never been yours."
Not exactly what I said, Blue (although am a bit disturbed that you remember that
. I said it again at the start of this thread:
People seeing taxes as 'their' money, or some sort of savings account really does bug me. Once you have paid your tax, it is no longer your money. It's the government's. If you don't like how they are spending it, exercise your democratic right to elect a different government.
That's how you have an opinion, approval or objection to how the government spends its money.
The OP agreed with me.
What I am struggling with is how on earth it is different when somebody (erroneously) says that they've paid their taxes, so they are entitled to get them back, and someone else complains that their taxes are paying for them?
It's completely hypocritical. Taxes are not a savings account, nor are they a benevolent fund. Both statements demonstrate a complete lack of understanding of how the tax system works; yet one is being used to vilify the other. It's bizarre.
And yes, once again it is worth pointing out that a society which has more money in unclaimed benefits bears no resemblance to the society some posters seem to think we live in.