Oh, look, ffs, why do we have to keep debating this nonsense? Yes, obviously, if someone is put on a starvation diet, they will lose weight (not many people in Belsen were at the gym every day though, either- and can't bloody believe the need to Godwin a moronic fat-phobia thread, how offensive can you get?) However, why the fuck would people living in a society where lots of nice food is readily available want to starve themselves, and why the hell should they? Yes, some people are obese. Some people were also obese in the 1930s- I have family photographs to prove it. Yes, if they'd been starved, they probably wouldn't have been, but they clearly weren't eating McD's every day... Similarly, I am at the top end of 'normal' weight- I can get down lower than that by starving myself, but I can't be arsed. I am not regularly called 'fat' by anyone with a normal perspective on things, and my GP doesn't think I need to lose weight (though I don't, and never will, look like a model/actress). However, I have friends who eat FAR more healthily than I do who are obese. They might do less exercise than me, yes, but most of the exercise I do is tearing around after hyper kids. They definitely get their 5-a-day, whereas I often don't get round to it (though some of us with similar eating habits were recently pondering at a family event whether 5 a day had to be 5 different kinds of biscuit or whether 5 bourbons count- any answers appreciated). I'd be a complete moron to claim I was doing something better than them. I'm not, and I don't think being lighter is a virtue of any kind whatsoever. I also know people who are thinner than me who eat crisps every day and can't manage to walk up a hill (whereas my fat friends can).