The Non-Feminist Point of View

[JamesHuff]

I have noticed over the last while that the Feminist section has grown over the last bit.

This does not surprise me, but I feel compelled to ask why this site has begun to ascribe to a sociopolitical ideology when it was originally a resource for parents.

I think that as a result of this discrepancy, non-feminist points of view should have their own section as well. I hope people who disagree with inequalities feminism has created within our legislation will be compelled to express themselves more often.

I don't see it as unreasonable. Since there will be disagreements on various topics, I just figure a non-feminist based section would be in order. This way parents have a choice that reflects both sides of the coin.

Ok bucking the trend and on a SERIOUS note I wish to add my penneth. And I know I am totally BU as I've only made it to page 8 (ish)

Anyhow I wish to pick up on an extremely good point that Trill made on circa page 3.............

I don't think that "sic" is used in that context either

JamesHuff3

The evil triplet now.

sequels are never that great.

''Nergal
May 23rd, 2011 - 02:06
She makes a lot of good points, but it is not impossible or even difficult for a woman to rape a man. There is an epidemic of females gang-raping men in Africa right now.
It happens all the time. Saying a man ?must have wanted it? because a female was able to rape him is exactly the same as Arabs saying a woman is an adulterer because she ?didn?t struggle enough? when she was raped or claiming a rape was consensual sex because a woman?s vagina got wet or she had an orgasm during a rape, which is not infrequent.'

Why does this James fella keep getting banned?

No, I mean why is he banned? I'm serious.

Ah do you feel sad you're not bad enough to be banned.

And yes sic isn't used like that. I have no idea what it was even meant to mean in that context

Dunno, is he? Dunno if 2 & 3 are him or not. Now, I've answered your question, Holdall, you answer mine. Why don't you want to be friends?

I don't think he does. I think mn wipe posts if they ban someone. And if they had a problem with him they would delete his thread.

Plus I don't think anyone is reporting his posts.

The posts that get deleted are via reporting. So whilst some big Jessie reported my poem I tend not to report as I think it is better to see what people write.

Perhaps he thinks it makes him mysterious?

What was your pome Pagz?

(on another note, Mimi has put a little toe in)

I suspect he would like to feel he was edgy and upsetting people here and we were reporting him.

[fail]

James, had a look and your blog is long on waffle, purple prose and inane commentary but short on substance.

At least admit you're here to try and wind a few people up without resorting to feeble attempts to justify your trolling with vague mumbling about 'data gathering'.

I'm sure your friends at pro misogyny.com are slapping your back for managing to get an entire forum taking the piss out of you, like it's some kind of achievement.

btw are you sure you're 37?

judging by your reply to the "Should a man hit a woman" thread you sound like a spotty teenage boy trying to come to terms with a bunch of unfamiliar hormonal feelings and channelling them in violent fantasies.

"Personally, I find the idea of retaliating with equal force to be disdainful. I am a big proponent of using twice the force that was used on me. I don't go around starting fights, and I walk away from situations where it may turn violent, but if I am cornered by anyone (man or woman), I will hurt them twice as bad. People do not learn their lesson from this "equal" application of force bullshit. Violence is fucking violence, and if your gonna have a damn war, then you better be in it to win.
If I get hit, I will do everything in my power to down that individual efficiently and effectively. I will then remind them if they want to DISCUSS the issue then I'm all for it....but if they EVER touch me again, I will put them in a world of pain and suffering. Whether it's a man or woman does not matter."

james huff, internet tough guy......

As my ode has been deleted I can safely report that it was a magnificent sweeping tribute to James and his inner beauty. But unfortunately had arse and tit in it. And not in a complimentary way.

Jamez pleaze or Bilz

Did it not remark on his massive schlong?

It did not. That would have been inaccurate uncouth

James isn't just a fighter, he's a lover too:

"There are TONS of erogenous zones...depending on how you touch them.
Backs of the knees (light touch)
Earlobes (light to hard bite)
Toes (sucking, biting, licking...esp. in between or along the bottom of the arch)
Ankles (more relaxing than erogenous, light touch and massage only)
Insides of thighs (light touch to hard biting)
small of back (light touch or massage)
just below the armpit (light touch)
Throat (light touch, light lick, or light suck along the artery or vein)
under the breasts (very light touch, or blowing air)
Belly button (light touch or lick)
Fingers (massage, suck or lick)
Wrists (light massage, light bite, or light touch)
Inside of elbows (light bite or light touch)
Back of neck (blow air, light massage, light touch, or light to heavy bite)
Spine (light lick, light touch)"

at the idea of women hating weirdo's sharing sex tips

Try posting it again Paggers - one of mine wouldnt post at first but worked second time.

I fear James is lost to us.
But mdowell has a certain come hither tone to his poetry. I feel he is trying to resist unleashing his baton d'amour

light suck along the artery

Fangs for that

Come on Holdall, you haven't answered my question.

I would but I can't remember it mdowell.

In fairness it wouldn't bear scrutiny. I am bigging it up a bit to try and impress hully. I love her