Perhaps Lesley but I can't stop them can I? I just have to get by with my 4 (all of whom have some level of SEN_ suspected as, diagnosed as, suspected add and autism).
Somewhat regretfully me and the NT world have very few links these days.
If people start, I stare back. I will never like confrontation but am used tio it now- everyone seems to have a dislike don;t they? the boy's noises, eating habits, clothes- something.
Anyway men are as likely to feel uncomfy as women if 'their' spaces are invaded and why don't their views count? Why should women in locked cubicles get the primary say?
If I could access disabled facillities without being eitehr refused or judged ( anything from being physically barred and accused of lying about AS at a festival to disabled people accusing me of wanting their disability) then I would.
But I won;t accept that I am a second rate person becuase I am a carer whose needs don;t fit a clear box and be made to feel that our needs are an inconvenience. Embarassment? yeah right, you should try the inconvenience of having 4 disabled kids then you might get it (and yes well done on the respite care- but you got to choose).
Maybe I have just ahd to toughen up over the eyars but I fail to see why someone would be that embarassed by knowing that a child is outside their locked door - a child of a different gender
- that they would insist their needs supersede those of the people using the other toilet that isn;t entirely cubciled.
Sorry if the existence of my child means that others feel he should be hidden rather than cause embarassment (as long as it's not my loo, right? the men can be invaded by you as carer without my concern....) but all cubcile supersedes part cubicle every time IMO. And it would be the same whether it was the males or females that were cubicled, it just so happens that in our society it is the female.