Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

"i am sitting here" right. "I am sat here" IS WRONG YOU FUCKERS

189 replies

MikeRotch · 11/04/2011 17:28

amen

OP posts:
Katisha · 12/04/2011 13:54

carnt?

MyLifeIsChaotic · 12/04/2011 14:24

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

Katisha · 12/04/2011 14:26

Ah, while I am in complete agreement that dialect does not excuse poor use of language, I do think that "youse" can actually be regarded as dialect in sime cases.

MadamDeathstare · 12/04/2011 14:29

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

MyLifeIsChaotic · 12/04/2011 14:29

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

MyLifeIsChaotic · 12/04/2011 14:31

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

Innishvickillaune · 12/04/2011 14:31

It is fast becoming "normal" = language variation and change. Linguistics 101, as they might say in the States.

JaneS · 12/04/2011 14:32

No, 'youse' is dialect. It's much older than the standardization of spelling/punctuation.

MadamDeathstare · 12/04/2011 14:33

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

thumbwitch · 12/04/2011 14:44

"youse" is in common usage in Australia when talking to more than one "you".

I don't have much of an issue with people saying "I am sat here, crying" as opposed to "I am sitting here" - possibly because the "I am sat here" is more of a description and not as relevant or active as the "crying" part of the phrase. I used to know more of the correct grammatical terminology to make more of an argument supporting why I don't particularly disagree with this usage (but it being quite commonly said where my Dad was brought up might have something to do with it, familiarity of usage makes it more acceptable)

However - use "loose" instead of "lose" and I will take your head off at the shoulders! Angry

MadamDeathstare · 12/04/2011 14:49

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

mumutd · 12/04/2011 14:54

I cannot believe I am reading a thread where people are slagging off others with bad grammar, when they are using foul language - kind of defeats the object from my point of view.

thumbwitch · 12/04/2011 14:59

Isn't "youse" a Dublinism as well? Which might go someway to explain its translocation to New York and Australia.

TotemPole · 12/04/2011 15:11

You was wasn't you. grr!

Inertia · 12/04/2011 19:33

I did teacher training in Liverpool, and because 'youse' is commonly used there as a plural form of you, the language teachers referred to it while explaining the different French forms of you.

Tangoromeooscarlimalima · 12/04/2011 19:35

of and have is almost worse than less and fewer :/

TotemPole · 12/04/2011 20:46

I should of known someone would mention that one.

buggerlugs82 · 12/04/2011 21:35

This reply has been withdrawn

This post has been withdrawn due to privacy concerns.

claretandcheese · 12/04/2011 21:37

Has anyone else noticed people starting every sentence with "so"?. For example, Q: " What is the meaning of this phenomenon........?"
A: " So, it's a common way to start a sentence".
Am I alone in noticing/hating this so much?

FlaminGreatGallah · 12/04/2011 21:43

I hate "ten items or less" at checkouts. I seethe Angry

Fewer fewer fewer fewer fewer!

And that's another one. Breathe for breath and vice versa. Gah!

Inertia · 12/04/2011 22:06

Claret, I've noticed the "So..." particularly when scientists / sociologists etc are explaining their findings on the radio.

IME all Australian cricketers begin every sentence with "Ah, look, ...".

claretandcheese · 12/04/2011 22:15

Oh good, I'm not alone, Inertia. I think you're right, on reflection, it does seem to be particularly rife with them. I have noticed it creeping in with politicians too, though.

Maybe the sociologists have an excuse.

Olifin · 12/04/2011 23:06

buggerlugs...I hate to kick you when you're down but 'thickos' doesn't need an apostrophe. And you meant 'whose' rather than 'who's'. And grammar rather than grammer.

Olifin · 12/04/2011 23:13

Sorry if I've missed this but why did one poster suggest 'is wrong' is wrong?

I'm not a fan of 'gotten' as a past participle but I don't think I have a leg to stand on since it's apparently Old English and not an Americanism as is commonly thought.

Also really dislike 'Can I get....' in restaurants and so on. I don't suppose it's incorrect grammatically but I think it sounds hideously rude.

nijinsky · 12/04/2011 23:16

I also dislike "gotten". Its an American preservation of an earlier form of speech, but I'm not convinved that its taken out of place in its now common useage and should correctly appear at the end of the sentence.