Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

"i am sitting here" right. "I am sat here" IS WRONG YOU FUCKERS

189 replies

MikeRotch · 11/04/2011 17:28

amen

OP posts:
sungirltan · 11/04/2011 23:43

fortyplus - you could be really pedantic and say that statement is about the missing ''ve' and ',' as in 'yes, i've done it, yesterday'

he he

AngelsOnHigh · 12/04/2011 00:07

What WAS you name?. It was Angels and still IS Angels.

theoldtrout01876 · 12/04/2011 00:10

well where I grew up we used sat sitting :o as in" I am sat sitting here watching with interest",covers all angles i think :)

MadamDeathstare · 12/04/2011 01:33

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Inertia · 12/04/2011 01:35

JennyL, in our town there is a business with a sign proclaiming that it is an Independant mortgage broker. You'd think they would have checked the spelling.

My teeth itch when I hear "the baby wants fed" , "the dog wants walked" etc.

anonymosity · 12/04/2011 03:03

Has anyone pointed out that "is wrong" is actually incorrect?

OmShantiJack · 12/04/2011 05:23

"turned around and said...."

FUCKITYFUCKITYFUCKITYFUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK!!!!!!!

I hate that!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Quit fucking doing the spins and just fucking TAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAALK!!!!!!!!!!!

Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!

Ah, that's better.

shelinka · 12/04/2011 06:14

sungirltan 'yes, i've done it, yesterday' is wrong.

If it happened yesterday you need to use past simple - "I did it yesterday."

"I've done it" is present perfect. Either an action that happened in the past but is connected to the present, or an action that was done at some non-specific past time(s).
(Takes TEFL hat off :))

CountBapula · 12/04/2011 07:22

YABU to complain about people who use solecisms when your OP is badly worded and mispunctuated.

CountBapula · 12/04/2011 07:23

Your thread title, I mean.

rubyrubyruby · 12/04/2011 07:29

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

ArthurPewty · 12/04/2011 07:32

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

WebMistress · 12/04/2011 07:34

Hooray for grammar - hold onto the standards as they flap in the wind.

ArthurPewty · 12/04/2011 07:35

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

freyamalaya · 12/04/2011 07:41

And while we are on the subject... it is aitch and not Haitch thank you very much Smile

TheMonster · 12/04/2011 12:18
Ciske · 12/04/2011 12:22

For what it's worth OP, your use of capitalisation and grammar in the topic title doesn't exactly follow standard rules either. Hmm

FruitShootsChocolateThieves · 12/04/2011 12:29

I could of posted propar grammer on this thread but couldn't think of nothing to say Grin

speak propar like what I do...

puddingface · 12/04/2011 12:55

i had a neighbour who said 'torlet' it is fucking TOILET you moron

brought/bought
there/their too
off/of mean different things too

noddyholder · 12/04/2011 12:58

That does my brain in but not as much as all the people selling stuff in our local paper calling things 'chester draws'

TotemPole · 12/04/2011 13:05

She also text her husband yesterday. Argh! No! You textED him!

TheCowardlyLion though you are correct, I think textED is a stupid word, it sounds forced and false. Text'd would be easier on the ear.

KatishaVinganegg · 12/04/2011 13:06

To people complaining about OPs grammar - it's complicated...

KatishaVinganegg · 12/04/2011 13:07

Oh yes - I am already been on another thread ranting about "text" as past tense. NOT RIGHT AT ALL.

nijinsky · 12/04/2011 13:08

The latter is grammatically incorrect in correct English useage but when taken in the context of the accent, is probably grammatically correct. It seems to preserve a different usage of English, which probably reflects the Scandinavian influence more prevalent in that part of the world once. I would guess the use of "sat" instead of "sit" reflects some attempt to change its form as you would a strong verb rather than changing the ending as you would with a weak verb.

buggerlugs82 · 12/04/2011 13:49

This reply has been withdrawn

This post has been withdrawn due to privacy concerns.

Swipe left for the next trending thread