I'm actually feeling quite sorry for this man now.
First the OP says "it's his own filthy mind" and then pulls a confused face when it's pointed out he might be concerned more about himself and the accusations that could be made of him, then implies that since she didn't notice her daughter had no pants on that he must have gone out of his way to notice himself and then says this "or he is covering himself which is a whole other discussion" which just proves the poor man can't win.
He sends a child home to put pants on before he allows her sister to play at washing his car and it means he has a filthy mind, he may have been concerned about being accused of paedophilia when he sent her home and so obviously by having that concern he has proved that he is a paedophile who's covering up the fact by asking a little girl to get dressed before she plays in his garden or outside his house.
No. I grew up in the late 70's and early 80's and did my fair share of trotting about with not much on. And now we have LO I'm quite relaxed about letting him see me naked while I get dressed or take a shower. I have to be, DH works away so there is nobody to watch him otherwise. It's doors wide open no matter what in our house at the moment.
And he does enjoy time to play or run about with his nappy off. Thanks to the good weather we have had a few days of him being naked in the paddling pool too. But I still wouldn't expect other people on our street to feel comfortable with him being naked in their house or garden or even on the street outside their home.
It's all very well to start saying "it's all paedo-noia" but you have to be realistic. No, there really isn't a paedophile behind every door but there are some and nobody really knows who or where. Melissa George proved that even when you think your children are safely supervised, sometimes they are not, although these times are thankfully rare.
We've been on the other side of this. My father is a talented and quite successful wildlife photographer and has volunteered his time and efforts to a local park. Thanks to his work they have documented twice the amount of birds and wildlife that can be seen in the park, which has gained them an increase in funding from the local council and seen a rise in visitors to the park who want to see the wildlife they now know is there.
And yet the police still stopped my father while he was there to ask him why he was hanging about in a park with a camera during the school holidays.
They couldn't even give him the producer they are legally supposed to give to the people they stop in this way but they still questioned him, took his name, address and car registration and made a call on the radio to check him out.
Even the fact that he was standing beside a big board displaying his photos and a letter from the park officials thanking him for his voluntary efforts didn't convince them he wasn't there to take photo's of children.
So I hate the paedo-noia as much as anyone. But I still wouldn't let my child run half naked into other peoples homes or gardens, as much for their sake as his.
And I really don't like the idea of saying that someone who wants a child to cover up and put on pants is a secret paedo covering his tracks. "I'm innocent!" "That's exactly what you would say if you were guilty, therefore you are!" No.