Hatwoman
I don?t know how short term contracts suited her as she has not said. However I am not willing to jump on the ?evil employer? bandwagon based on the simple fact that she worked short term contracts for 10 years. I admit it COULD be shoddy employment standards, but does not necessarily mean it IS. Seemly from what little she has posted here it looks like she might have a case through the proper channels, under UK labour laws
Which is why I, like others, have said. A: don?t ask your friend to lie to get benefits that you are not currently entitled to, and B: seek professional advice to address any injustices and entitlements she is owed.
Who on earth would pass on permanent contracts? Me for one. I have worked in public sector(albeit in Canada) where short term contracts come up as well as long term contracts. I have chosen to remain on short term contracts over secure long term contracts. I did this for 6 years.
When I was working for the health authority, I passed over permanent positions I was eligible for and bid on a short term contracts. Even though they were sometimes the same positions. ( ie a maternity cover came up at the same time as a fulltime position?I bid on the mat cover even though I could have bid on and won the full time) The short term contract allowed me to work full time while I was not in school, and structure my life as I wanted.
It also allowed me to try different positions. If I had taken a permanent position I would have had much less flexibility. I could have chosen to take a permanent contract, and all the benefits that went with it. I chose not to. I didn?t ?put up with it? and many people are just like me happy to work short term contracts for reasons of their own. If we regret it later that?s on us not the employer!
All I?m trying to say is people?s choices differ, and there are benefits to short term contracts, even if they are not to your taste. If the OP passed on contracts or positions in favor of short term contracts for whatever reasons( I believe she mentioned somewhere moving from another trust into this particular position, as it was a job she had been seeking) That does not necessarily mean the employer is out to keep workers from benefits, it could also be that the employee choices and preferences did not align with the contracts/positions they had available.
And yes I do think that employee who put up with shoddy work practices for long periods of time, especially when they can seek redress but do not, have to own some of the responsibility. This is does not absolve the employer of responsibly. People may not chose to be in a difficult position, but when they don?t act to change it, they are choosing inaction and for whatever reason they have still made a choice( not to act) I do know what it?s like to work in a field where employers will attempt to skirt the edges of their responsibilities, and I do realize that it is hard to address employment difficulties.
This is not comparable to women being forced to resign when they married. They had no option and it was wrong. There are now avenues for labour disputes( Union ect) . I don?t see this as offensive, harsh maybe, but that?s the way I see it.