Um, actually, I have "comfort" eaten..... I can pinpoint times where things have been going completely crap and I have had no other way of making myself feel better than to eat something I love (instead of doing vodka through my eyeballs or kicking the cat or breaking windows, all things I would consider outrageous and anti-social and unproductive and would be judged negatively for!)
However, eating a huge amount of chocolate or whatever can feel like a reward or nurturing behaviour when all else seems bleak. If for any reason you can't get support or comfort another way, food can seem like the lesser of many evils, and can give comfort - tastes, smells and textures can take one back to a time when one felt secure and happy, and sometimes that's not a bad thing if you can control it.
What worries me about the judgemental aspect surrounding over-eaters, is what happens if they are already in such a bleak emotional place that food is the only thing they feel helps them cope? Tell them they're wrong and to pull themselves together without the right support and they may feel even more desperate. Or would that be an acceptable thing, to weed out the defective with so little self-control?
I can see both sides of the argument, but think that society as a whole really needs to sort out all the double standards and mixed messages we are constantly bombarded with about every aspect of life, not just food. We are told to make our own choices and trust our own instincts, yet when it comes to lifestyle, from parenting right through education to eating, there is always a new official or unofficial perspective being put out there.
So we are supposed to sift through it all, use the bits that are sensible etc and that suit us, only to discover that no, that was wrong too, and someone is going to pass judgement and claim that ignorance is no defence.
Is it any wonder that some people find life harder than others? And do they really deserve such little compassion? Nobody is perfect after all.